Warwick Don replies
In this issue Ian Wishart responds to Warwick Don's critique of his article on Intelligent Design.
In this issue Ian Wishart responds to Warwick Don's critique of his article on Intelligent Design.
Ian Short provides a few comments on the Treasurer's Report presented to the 2000 AGM.
AS MOST readers will now be aware, the Ian Plimer/Allen Roberts court case has been adjudicated, and the results for Ian were not as he had hoped. The case was brought under federal Trade Practices legislation and state Fair Trading legislation and concerned two issues. The first was a breach of copyright action, where Ian's co-applicant, David Fasold, alleged that Roberts had used a diagram, Fasold's intellectual property, without permission. The second issue alleged that, in his lectures and sale of tapes, etc, Roberts had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in pursuit of trade.